Greatest Hoaxers

In what continues to distract from meritorious scientific argument regarding the theory of anthropogenic global warming, experts from both sides of the debate are regularly outed as shills for biased industrial or political concerns. In 2006, IPCC panelists intent on downplaying the impact of global warming were connected to monies from fossil fuel companies. Now, two scientists predicting the gravest consequences of our warming world have likewise been found of dubious predilection.